Continue alternatives/vs Cline/2026

Continue vs Cline

If you want to keep working the way you worked in Continue, in VS Code, against your own API key, Cline is the shortest move on the board: Apache-2.0, and the most active release line in this category. It is also the pairing where the awkward question has to be asked out loud, because Cline is a venture-funded company with a single founder-CEO, which is a fairly precise description of what Continue, Inc. was in 2023. This page argues for the switch and names the risk in the same breath.

Quick answer

Pick Cline if you want a maintained, Apache-2.0 assistant in the editor you already use, with no vendor meter unless you opt in, and you would rather have shipping software with a named risk than frozen software with none. Stay on Continue if your setup is offline or pinned, you use inline completion more than an agent, and you would rather not repeat the migration in two years if Cline's investors find an exit.

Side by side

Continue vs Cline at a glance

 ContinueCline
Who owns it Cursor (Anysphere) after the acquisition Cline Bot Inc., one founder-CEO
Outside moneyNever disclosed; no figure on its Y Combinator page$32M combined Series A and seed, announced 2025-07-31, led by Emergence Capital and Pace Capital
LicenceApache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written governance none No GOVERNANCE.md, no CLA, no trademark policy
Form factorVS Code and JetBrains extensionVS Code extension, plus CLI, SDK and desktop builds
Bring your own key Yes, via config.yaml Yes, any provider plus local models
Vendor's paid tierNone: billing disabled, unused credits refundedCline credits pay-as-you-go; ClinePass $9.99 per month; both documented as optional
Enterprise priceGone with the company "Custom, contact sales": no published figure
Latest release v2.0.0 stable for VS Code, 2026-06-19, plus a v2.1.0 prerelease v4.1.11, 2026-08-21
Open pull requests 456 open, 179 filed since the final release, 3 merged Reviewed and released continuously
Hosted services requiredNone left, because none work None, unless you choose credits or ClinePass
Stars (2026-08-21)35,56866,572

Sources: Cline pricing · Cline repository · Continue repository · Continue docs. Funding figure from Cline's own announcement post. Compiled August 2026.

Where Cline wins

It is the one that is actually shipping

v4.1.11 was released on 2026-08-21, and Cline's release cadence is the fastest in this shortlist. Continue's last release was 2026-06-19 and its last commit on main was 2026-07-21. For a tool whose whole job is to broker between your editor and model APIs that change monthly, that difference is not cosmetic: a provider adds a model, a rate limit changes, an SDK deprecates something, and one of these two projects will respond.

The default is at-cost, and the paid tiers say so themselves

Cline's pricing page lists Open Source as free and Enterprise as custom. In between are two opt-in conveniences: pay-as-you-go Cline credits, and ClinePass at $9.99 per month standard rate, currently $4.99 for the first month, which the docs describe as 2 to 5 times the usage on popular open coding models compared with standard API rates. Those are vendor claims about their own gateway, so read them as marketing; the sentence worth quoting is Cline's own, that ClinePass is completely optional and you do not need it to use Cline. That is the same deal Continue offered, with the difference that nobody has turned the lights off.

The licence is real Apache-2.0, with no carve-out

Verified at the repository's LICENSE file: Apache-2.0 across the project, with no ee/ directory carrying a different licence. That matters because it is not the norm in this category. Tabby, for example, is Apache-2.0 except everything under ee/, which requires paid seats for production use, and Roo Code's successor Roomote went to the Fair Core License, Version 1.0, ALv2 Future License, which is source available rather than open source until each release converts to Apache-2.0 on its second anniversary.

It stays in your editor

Every other strong option here asks you to change how you work: goose is a desktop and terminal agent, opencode is a terminal agent, Zed is an entire editor. Cline is a VS Code extension first, so the migration is an install and a set of API keys rather than a new habit, and if you also want a terminal or scripted path it ships a GA CLI on npm, an SDK and a desktop build alongside the extension.

Where Continue still wins

Cline has not rebuilt Continue's config file, and that is the practical friction: your config.yaml does not port, and anything you had in Continue's Hub cannot be exported because that host has no DNS record and the export page returns 404. One concrete gap: Continue shipped inline tab completion as you type, and Cline does not. Cline is agent-only by design, and tab completion is still an open feature request in its tracker. If typing-time suggestions were the half of Continue you used daily, Cline replaces the chat and agent half only, and you will want a separate completion model for the rest.

And the honest structural point cuts Continue's way once, briefly. Continue's risk is now zero, because the thing that could go wrong already did: no company, no billing, no server to switch off, and an irrevocable licence on the code you have installed. Cline's risk is live. It is one company, one founder-CEO, $32M of institutional money that will eventually want a return, and no written governance saying who inherits the merge button. That is not an accusation, it is the same shape as every project on this page except goose, which is held by a foundation, and Zed, whose copyleft licence forces a fork to stay open. If your organisation now treats custody as a procurement question, Cline will not pass it. If your organisation wants software that gets patched next month, Continue will not pass that.

Migrating Continue to Cline

The path most teams take:

1. Inventory first. Pull your model definitions, rules and prompts out of config.yaml and out of your notes. Hub-sourced assistants and rules are unrecoverable; the 30-day export window closed on 2026-07-15 and continue.dev/export now 404s, so treat whatever is on your disk as the only copy.
2. Install and bring the keys, not the file. Add your provider keys to Cline, or point it at the local model you were already using. Skip credits and ClinePass on day one; the free path is the default and there is no reason to add a meter while you are still evaluating.
3. Run both for one cycle. Continue is not going to break while you decide, which is the one convenience of a shutdown that has already happened. Both tools bill through your own provider account, so the overlap costs extra tokens rather than a second subscription.
4. What does not move. Your Continue chat history, your Hub items, and whatever you scripted against api.continue.dev with the cn CLI or the Continue SDK, since that endpoint no longer answers. If that scripting is the core of your setup, look at opencode instead; if custody is the thing you cannot risk twice, read the goose comparison first.

Common questions

FAQ: Continue vs Cline

Do I have to pay for Cline?

No. Cline's pricing page lists Open Source as free and Enterprise as custom with no published figure. You connect your own provider keys, or a local model, and pay the model provider directly. Two paid paths exist and Cline's own docs call them optional: pay-as-you-go Cline credits, and ClinePass at $9.99 per month standard rate, currently $4.99 for the first month, which the docs describe as giving 2 to 5 times the usage on popular open coding models compared with standard API rates. The documentation states plainly that you do not need ClinePass to use Cline.

Could Cline be acquired the way Continue was?

Yes, and it is worth saying so rather than pretending otherwise. Cline is Cline Bot Inc., a single company with one founder-CEO, and it announced $32M in combined Series A and seed funding on 2025-07-31, led by Emergence Capital and Pace Capital with several other funds and angels. Institutional investors need an exit eventually. The repository has no GOVERNANCE.md, no CLA and no trademark policy, so there is no written answer to who would hold merge rights if the company stopped. What you keep in any scenario is the Apache-2.0 code you already have.

Is Cline a drop-in replacement for Continue?

It is the closest of the options here in form factor, because it is a VS Code extension rather than a terminal tool or a new editor, and it takes your own API keys or a local model just as Continue did. It is not a file-level port: your Continue config.yaml does not transfer, and anything you pulled from Continue's Hub has no export path because that host no longer resolves. One concrete gap remains: Continue shipped inline tab completion as you type and Cline does not. Cline is agent-only by design, and tab completion is still an open feature request in its tracker. If typing-time suggestions were the half of Continue you used daily, Cline replaces the chat and agent half only, and you will want a separate completion model for the rest.